Classic Vs Newage

[evokiller]

check these out can you tell the difference

http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/hh45/ev...pa250038ye7.jpg

http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/hh45/ev...dscf0379dd5.jpg

this is a cheap way to an new age but with classic handeling it just looks stupid a few of you will have seen these before no doubt cheers scoobzie

Edited January 10, 2008 by evokiller

[frank c]

Oh dear !

[dipsy]

Is it a cut and shut job

[boris b]

Beauty is in the eye of .... Blah Blah Blah....... Each to their own i suppose

[scouk]

That's odd!

I've seen a bugeye converted to a blobeye before.. but this is new!.. Prefer the hawkeye front end myself...

[the blue dragon]

Waste of a classic imho.

[rallyfever]

What were they thinking?????

[superstar_tradesman]

NO NO NO NO NO. That looks awfull.

[speech]

In the side on pic the front wing looks a different shade of white to the rest of the car?

Might just be me though!!

[the squiggle]

In the words of Louie from X Factor

"I liked it"

Always wondered what a Type R version of the New-Age would have looked like

[thewelsho]

In the side on pic the front wing looks a different shade of white to the rest of the car?

Might just be me though!!

Yeah it does. Probably becasue they painted the new front-end and never painted the res of the car to match. Can't say I'm too keen on it, though it might look better in the metal.

[nanaki]

hmm...

apart from absolutely horrid i reckon that could actually be done properly.

using the newage front is fine however they need to do a wide arch section at the back to balance it out.