Jump to content

johns

Full Member
  • Posts

    2,928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by johns

  1. Zanders has confirmed his place for Saturday, and will pay on the day. He'll be travelling down from ABZ with myself, Mark and Alan. John
  2. Dave, the 3 people I'm bringing are: Confirmed as definites: Alan Denny (Vauxhall!) Mark Paterson (Ford, but hopefully Subaru soon) To confirm tonight Zanders (Subaru) Cheers John
  3. Grant, I apologise if my posts have come across in the wrong way, but in no way was I attempting to criticise the excellent events that you have run in the past and are planning for the future. Having organised many of these in the past, I fully appreciate the time, effort and cost it takes to do the recce, route calculations, printing of maps etc. Next TDE - perhaps later this year. The main reasons there hasn't been one for the past few years is lack of time on my part to plan and organise, due to a) a change in jobs which involved longer hours, work at evenings/weekends etc, moving house last year and c) lack of time and money due to a and b! Regards the printing of maps etc., what I've done in the past is to issue them to "trusted" people who have taken part in one or two previous events so they can a) print their own maps and have a day or two to familiarise themselves with the route/directions/junctions/stopping points etc. That way if groups do get split up, then there's a good chance that someone will know where to go, without having to stop at a junction for a minute or two working out where they are on the map and where to go to next. Cheers John
  4. Dave, can you add another one for me as well please Will see him tonight and confirm tomorrow. John
  5. Chris, no-one is saying that this is a new format that must be adhered to - I'm simply passing on the benefit of experience as we're in the middle of the season where there are many regional events taking place and probably plenty of small runs organised. The big difference between your daily/weekly runs with a few others is that on bigger events run in this way is that you'll meet everyone for an hour or more at the start of the event, most people at lunchtime and everyone at the end again. In between, you'll drive faster, probably further and may well have more fun than if you were in the middle of a big group (it can be scary to be near the end actually!). If you are at an event and everyone wants to drive in one group then that's fine (it's great to have a huge turn-out of cars together ), but it can cause some logistical problems which can take the edge off (long periods of waiting around doing nothing) what otherwise is a fantastic day for most people. It's also much easier on the organiser, as they are only "responsible" for a small group, and not 40 - 50 cars for most of the day. Cal - spot on. We had someone at an event quite a few years back who boasted about how good he was, how he was going to leave everyone behind etc. Turns out he was a real liability, some very dodgy overtaking with some near head-ons. If he got left behind in a group, he would pull some stupid moves to keep up, and do things like 60mph through a 30 zone just to try and catch up. When leading a group, he would pull the same moves and drive very aggresively behind cars making it a nightmare for anyone following to overtake anything without getting abuse. Thing was, when the road was clear of traffic, the others following could keep up with ease through the corners and thought the pace was very relaxed... John
  6. The amount of wear/tear on a strut after only a few thousand miles is negligible these days. They should be well within spec even after 30 - 40k k miles using modern production techniques and materials. I've had two new rear struts on my car in the past 3 years (knocking), and honestly didn't notice any adverse effect of just having the one replaced. Subaru Uk have replaced probably a few hundred of these individually over the past few years under warranty, all without futher issue. Think of it another way - if you had 4 new tyres fitted, and after 3,000 miles you got a nail through the sidewall of one of them. Would you replace all 4 or a pair ? I suspect like most people you would simply replace the single tyre, as the wear on the others would be negligible. The old adage of replacing these in pairs tends to only apply to older vehicles, where there could be a serious change in performance of a shock absorber over say 20k miles. At 60k miles one could develop a leak and need replacement, and it would be suicidal to only replace the one of them. However, on modern cars this is much less of an issue and I don't believe there's any real need for concern. John
  7. Sounds like a huge amount of fun
  8. Thanks for the feedback Kenny is indeed correct in that much of the above post was written many years ago, and 95% of it was posted on the Scottish Elises mailing list a few months ago. I had been planning to update it for some time, and did so whilst off on holiday for a couple of weeks. They are not formal rules that must be adhered to, I'm just passing on the experience many of us have gained over the years. If people want to do their own thing, then they are more than free to do so. The guideline about groups of no more than 4 evolved over a period of a few runs. Originally we started off with the bigger convoy approach which worked fine and was great fun. I think we did about 5 or 6 runs like this at meets across the country. However there were a few drawbacks with it. We found that the convoy got split up frequently, as some drivers didn't feel safe to overtake without seeing a clear road ahead (eg if 5 or 6 cars ahead had overtaken, some drivers would wait until cars ahead had all pulled back in to make sure the road was clear for them to pass also). This delay often frustrated drivers behind who had been watching ahead and could see the road was clear but they couldn't pass until the car in front had done so. This led to people at the rear often missing out on perfectly good opportunities, or in some cases taking higher risks to pass in order to keep up. This in turn annoyed the cars being passed, who could become obstructuve to following cars. We then tried the approach of keeping going until the next scheduled stop, and not trying to reform the convoy. What we discovered is that groups of 3 to 5 cars can make much better progress and enjoy themselves for a much higher proportion of the time, especially those at the front who were constantly slowing down and waiting for others to catch up. Those in following groups felt much less pressure to overtake at the earliest opportunity, and correspondingly enjoyed things a lot more also. They were able to "see" the road ahead much more clearly and enjoy the drive a lot more, rather than simply following the long line of cars in front. We then discovered the other big bonus of stopping at smaller rural petrol stations with only one or two SUL pumps. Smaller groups don't cause any chaos, and people aree in and out in under 10 minutes. With a big group, you get queues sometimes spilling onto the roads. With the next group following 5 - 10 minutes behind, there was still plenty time to exchange stories between groups as they filled up and headed off again. In a bigger group, those at the front would often have to park up for 30 minutes whilst those at the rear filled up. This also meant some locals had to wait 30 - 40 minutes for fuel, despite the diesel pumps being unused for an hour The same thing happened when stopping at pubs for lunch etc. Most kitchens cope fine with cooking meals for tables of 5 to 10 people at once. They tend to struggle with larger groups, and you end up getting long delays for food and then you have the problems of paying at the end, as the pubs prefer to have the one bill for payment, and you have the problems of people saying "I only had a portion of chips, whilst he had a fillet steak with all the trimmings, why shoudl I pay for a portion of his meal" and so on. Arriving in smaller groups meant that they could order, get served and pay easily, and not have to wait for 45 minutes whilst the rest of the convoy finished lunch etc. The end result if that everyone has a lot more time for driving, and still more than plenty of time for chat over lunch etc We did try the pre-ordering food thing once, but it wasn't a huge success, as two people on one table would get their food first, and the others on their table might have to wait 5 to 10 minutes etc., as it wasn't possible to order the food by table in advance. I think perhaps in the earlier days (we are talking 7 - 8 years ago now!), we had a few owners who were trying to prove to the others that they were the best/fastest driver, or had the most modified car and hence should be at the front etc. I honestly don't believe we have the same problem today, hence the success and safe record of some convoy type runs over the past year or two Over another few runs, people naturally went in groups where they knew how the others drove (style, safety etc), and generally things were much more enjoyable for everyone. The next stage was when some of the faster drivers wanted to do a slightly longer route, and they would look at the maps and take an extra detour for some parts (e.g. an extra 10 - 20 mile loop). The end result was that they drove more (which they wanted), and everyone arrived at the destination around the same time. On later events, we deliberately looked for routes where an optional extra leg or two was possible and gave people the choice. If they were ahead of schedule they could do the extra bits, if they spent a long time over coffee at the previous stop, then they could take the shorter route, or even a short cut. The end result was that everyone started off the day together as a group, met up as a group over various stops and finished the day together, albeit some arriving 20 minutes or so behind those first to get to the destination. Everyone drove at the speed they wanted to, for a distance that suited them and with drivers they felt comfortable with. There was also much less flashing of lights, sounding of horns etc from other drivers on the road. With regards to the question of whether faster of slower groups should go first - it all depends on the drivers and the routes. We used to mix things up, and if one group caught another on the road, then the leading group would pull over or slow down and let the following group past. We tended not to have named groups such as fast, medium or slow, as everyone likes to think they are a fast driver but there are big differences in driver abilities. We had group 1, group 2 and so on. At scheduled stopping points, people could swap groups if they wanted to if the group they were in drove too fast or slow for their liking. Typically though, the faster drivers would go towards the end, as over the distance between stops, they could make up a bit more time. If they went first, then they could wait a long time for the last group to appear, never see anyone etc. Finally, it wasn't an easy task to organise an event where you have lots of groups taking different routes at different times etc. I think I spent several days effort over a period of a few months working everything out, planning food stops, petrols stations etc. We even managed to persuade one remote petrol station to specifically get in stocks of SUL/Optimax for us for the weekend! Hope you all have safe and fun driving this summer John
  9. The government have become very successful in drumming the message home that speeding kills, to the point that overtaking is very much a lost artform these days. Virtually no-one overtakes on A and B roads unless they are dual carriageways because they'll need to break the speed limit to do so in a safe distance. Hence we get long convoys of cars stuck behind someone doing 45mph when they could be doing 60mph legally and safely. The explosion of people carriers and off-road type 4x4s has made the problem worse, as these don't really have the power to overtake, but are very effective at blocking the roads as you can't see past/though them as easily as normal cars. These types of cars generally have enough performance to get up to 55/60mph in a straight line more or less at the same rate as "normal" cars, but due to the high centre of gravity, owners slow down much earlier for corners and go around corners much more slowly. They are then capable of accelerating up to their 55mph cruising speed (assume speedo reads 60mph), oblivious to the fact that cars behind that cannot pass them. Then when you do get drivers with the skills and performance to overtake safely, you get loads of frustrated motorists getting annoyed/jealous. They have had the SPEED KILLS message drummed into them for the past x years, and so start flashing their headlights, blocking drivers from overtaking and of course phoning the police on their mobile phones to report lunatic drivers who aren't doing anything wrong. As some of you are aware, the SIDC used to do many weekend runs and events like the Tour d'Ecosse which were fantastic fun, very safe (never had any accidents, speeding tickets or even a producer!), but sadly the increased activity of the police meant that you spent most of the time wondering where and when one or more of the cars would be stopped that day. Where we have had problems in the past is on "one-day" events, where there's less control over who turns up and takes part. At least on the 2 to 3 days TDE events, people were booked into a hotel for a few nights and got to know each other very well. Unlike some of the one-off events where we had a mix of unknown people coming along, who know-one knew, had contact details for and could spoil the whole event through a few dodgy overtaking manoeuvers or speeding in an attempt to keep up or prove they were the best driver. On the last big TDE (about 50-60 people in total), I developed the idea of splitting all the cars into groups of 4, sending them out on different routes, in different directions every 10 minutes. The idea being that only one group of 4 cars would travel the same stretch of road every 30 minutes, and many roads would only be travelled once. More importantly, it was likely that any other road users would only ever encounter the one group of cars in any direction. Most groups would meet up with others around lunchtime and then head off in different directions again afterwards. People could choose a route with the driving distance and scenery that suited them. Some people did lots of driving, others did only a few hundred miles. This plan worked very well, and I don't think anyone hardly even saw a police car at any point during the event, though the local police (having seen the cars parked up overnight) did come to our hotel for a quiet word about sensible driving the next morning before anyone set off. The one big thing that bikes have in their favour, is that it's virtually impossible for anyone other than a hardcore biker to identify individual bikes as make/models as they overtake at speed. Hence any reports that the police pick up as a group of 3/4/5 bikes and there's no proof that any of the dozens of small groups of bikes on any road on any day were responsible. It's so much easier with a group of cars all the same make/model. However, if there are several small groups of the same type of cars on different routes, it's very easy to say that an incident didn't occur in your group. This is more difficult if you have a car in your group that is very distinctive (e.g. stickers, body kit, distinctive colour, easy to remember registration plate etc). So what can be done ? From the feedback provided by people who reported "lunatics in sports cars" to police in the past, the one thing that gets people irate is what "they perceive" to be dangerous overtaking or agressive driving. It seems that drivers don't really mind people driving fast, but they hate being put in danger. Hence anyone who tailgates closely, then nips past at the first possible opportunity - possibly followed by a few other cars in close formation is likely to trigger their rage/anger. If you can pass one or more cars without upsetting anyone enough, then no-one will report you for anything (even false stories about dangerous driving!) Most motorists also associate loud exhausts with driving fast, even though cars remained within the limits at all times. Below are some guidelines and rules that we've developed over the past few years that have helped tremendously. A lot of these can also be used if you are driving on your own to further your enjoyment and safety Drive only in small groups of no more than 4 cars at a time. Any more, and it starts to become virtually impossible to drive as a single group, as you spend all your time trying to keep the convoy together. It also leads to huge delays at petrol stations, ordering and receiving food at pubs if there is one big group. Smaller groups arriving 10 minutes apart present no such problems. Leave at least 5 minutes between groups on the road, and ideally 10 to 15 minutes. Driving in a small group of drivers you know (and trust) is much more satisfying especially if everyone drives at or about the same pace. Quite often in a larger group/convoy, you'll get people who want to drive faster and if they are stuck at the back this can lead to frustration and dodgy overtaking. Conversely, some people can end up driving more quickly than they are comfortable with just to keep up and it's only a matter of time then... Most of the time, you'll please 50% of people, 25% will be frustrated at the slow pace, and 25% will be terrified at having driven so quickly if they aren't used to it. Driving in small groups enables drivers to gain valuable experience from others, and this isn't possible in a big group. Each member in the group should have the mobile phone number of the other cars in their group programmed into their phone before they set-off. That way if someone gets stuck behind traffic and gets lost, they can pull over and talk to the driver/passenger in a car ahead and all is well. This can also be very useful if there's a last minute change of plan (e.g. roadworks, roadside safety/speed checks, unscheduled photo or refreshment stop etc). The lead cars in any group should also have the numbers of the lead cars of ideally all the other groups, but at the very least the group ahead and behind them. That way important information can be relayed to them which may prevent problems. Keep a good distance between all cars in your group at all time (ie 5 to 10 cars lengths) especially when catching slower cars. That way they know you aren't racing each other. Racing on the public highway is a very serious offence (possibly ranked more serious than dangerous driving!) and the last thing anyone wants is to be accused by a member of the public of racing. Keeping a good distance between the cars virtually eliminates the problem of stonechips. Don't worry if the group gets split up when coming up behind a slower car or group of cars. You'll re-group later at the pre-arranged meeting points. Normally the lead car would slow down from "cruise" speed but still go faster than most other traffic, and the following cars will catch up over the course of 5 - 10 minutes when they find safe opportunities to overtake. If the lead car(s) overtook a group of cars, then they shouldn't stop at the next suitable point. 99% of the time, the cars they overtook will pass shortly afterwards and there is then the problem of passing them again. Exceptions to this are when there is a T junction when it isn't obvious which is the right way to go, when the lead car can wait until the following cars catch up and then drive off slowly so that the following members of the group can see which way they went. The lead car(s) keeps a safe distance behind the slower car(s) and then waits for a safe opportunity to pass that would allow at least two three cars to pass safely before overtaking. If the lead car nips past in a "tight" space causing either the driver being passed or the oncoming driver to "suck their teeth" or comment to their passengers that "that was close!", then the cars following on behind are on a hiding to nothing, especially if they try to overtake to keep up with the lead car. Stick religiously to speed limits in all towns and villages at all times. Yes it may mean that the local car you overtook 2 minutes ago catches up with you and sits behind you in a 30mph zone, but it's not something they'll report you to anyone for and they'll respect the fact you are sticking to the limits in areas where their kids or relatives live (even though they might be used to driving through at 40mph themselves!). Don't immediately return to "cruising" speed when leaving a village, especailly if there are cars behind you. Instead pull ahead gently, and build up to speed through a few corners. This way people won't think you are on some sort of "mission". Look out for local cars and treat as though they were unmarked police cars!!. With a bit of practice, it's very easy to spot local cars. Most Scottish registration plates have an S in the prefix/suffix for example. Locals will know the road they are driving on, so won't slow down too early for some corners, road signs or junctions. Look for local garge stickers in their back window/registration plate. Why should you treat locals with high regard ? Chances are they are on a short journey, and will be pulling off in a mile or two. If someone overtakes them dangerously, chances are they'll know the phone number of their local police station, know the name of the policemen there, know the roads you are driving on, where you are likely to be heading, how long it will take to get there etc. They are also a lot more likely to get upset about what they perceive to be dangerous driving on their local roads. Treat them with respect and don't drive aggressively behind them and they'll think nothing about if you do find a suitable spot to overtake, and in fact they may even assist by indicating left when they come to a spot they know it's safe to overtake at. When overtaking, don't continue accelerating into the distance (especially if you have a loud exhaust). If you pass them comfortably and then don't disappear into the distance immediately, it's lets the drivers who have just been passed think that you are only going marginally faster than they were. Instead wait until you have gone around a few corners (which you take at higher speeds than them) and then pick up the pace again when you are a good distance ahead. If you have a loud exhaust, keep throttle/revs to a minimum when passing cars, approaching or leaving villages (usually lift off a good mile or two before the village, and 1/2 mile on leaving). On a quiet summers day, people in their gardens can hear you coming (and going) for a few miles in either direction. Give them plenty of notice and they'll be watching at their garden wall with mobile phone and digital camera in hand. On this same subject, if you see people in gardens/farms/walking by the side of the road, slow down and pass quietly, even if you aren't breaking the speed limit or have a quiet/standard exhaust. It lets these people know that you have seen them and you are being considerate towards them. In 90% of cases, you'll get friendly waves, which is infinitely better than shouts of abuse! If you can see from the road signs that you are only 2 or 3 miles from a village/town, then don't try to overtake the cars in front. Instead, chill out and relax for a few minutes. There's a good chance that one or more of the cars in front will stop/pull off in the village saving you and the other cars in your group the problem of passing them It also means you'll arrive and depart the village discretely. The organiser of a day/weekend out like this should take care to check for example that there aren't any events in the area for the planned date. For example, we were once caught out by a horse event, and some spent large parts of the day stuck behind horse trailers coming to/from the event. Watch out for village fairs, local cycle races, 10k fun runs, or even a nearby motorsport event. Take note of the time of year and the time of day. At this time of year, there's good daylight until at least 10pm, and probably 11pm further north. Even though it's peak tourist season, most rural roads are virtually deserted after 6:30pm as everyone is home, in the bar/restaurant having their dinner and settling down to watch TV for example. Some times of the day (e.g. mid Sunday morning) are especially busy with people travelling to church. If you can avoid these times, you give yourself a much better chance of having empty roads and a lot of fun. Avoid bank holiday weekends (and generally any time the schools are on holiday) if you can. We've tried it many times and you just end up frustrated at volumes of slower traffic and long convoys When taking part in an event of this nature, always remember the many long hours/days/weeks that the organiser has put into the smooth running. Why risk all their hard work to save a few seconds by only just overtaking a car safely, especially if you know you are going to be stopping 5 to 10 miles along the road. Just think of your own circumstances (what effect would it have on your family/job if you got banned for dangerous driving), or the reputation of the club/organisers and other people taking part. The above things may sound like it's taking a lot of the fun out of things, but if it means you can enjoy a fast run on the quieter stretches for 85% of your run, without any police intervention or annoying other motorists then it's a good thing. It's much better to have many good runs, than one or two "fantastic" ones where everyone was lucky to escape "unwanted attention" or have close shaves, only to be clamped down on hard for all future runs. Over the past few years, a few of us have continued to do these sort of events, but it's almost always done in small private local groups and not published anywhere. Notification is by word of mouth at local meets/events, email etc so as not to attract unwanted attention. By developing/sticking to the above guidelines, we've enjoyed many thousands of miles of fast, safe driving in groups over the past few years, and long may it continue John
  10. The Bridgestone S-03 is worth considering if budget isn't an option. Slightly better than the F1s in the dry (stiffer sidewall so less of a spongy feel), don't overheat so readily, and last slightly longer. Not quite the same levels of grip in the wet as the F1s (but very close). I've had both on my car(s) in the past, and preferred both of these to the Toyos (which weren't as consistent over the full tread depth and were also noisier). John
  11. Chris, you have to be very careful that the wheels you are interested in will actually clear the Brembo calipers. You can't tell this from any rim wize/width/offset numbers, as it also depends on the spoke design. John
  12. There shouldn't be any need to adjust the geometry if it's just the rear struts that are swapped over. The rear camber isn't adjustable (well not by more than a very small amount unless you use fancy bolts). The settings for toe-in/out etc shouldn't be modified, as they don't need to slacken anything else off other than the mounting bolts. John
  13. Dave, can I add another 1 to the reserve list please. His name is Mark Paterson. He needs to know by Thursday if he has a confirmed slot, as he'll need to arrange a day off work. Cheers John
  14. Superb work Andy Time to change your signature though John
  15. Sorry, I was unable to make it along either. Off on holiday at the moment and didn't get back from a day out with the family in time.... John
  16. I've been informed that the Optimax station in Beualy is no more. Been demolished to make way for a block of flats !
  17. Stan, there are a few places that do sell Esso Super Unleaded along the West Coast. Fort William is one, and I understand there's also a petrol station on Skye that sells SUL. There's a Shell garage in Contin (15 - 20 miles outside Inverness), and there's a Shell garage in Beauly as well that sells Optimax (or it did last time I was there). The Shell station in Ullapool quite often sells SUL/optimax as well, thoguh not all the time. If you phone ahead, then they will get soe sotcks in for you, though they tend to do that for bigger groups of cars. I've found in the past that one tank of fuel will do a day or two's general touring/driving around, and then it's no more than 30 - 45 minutes drive on average for a quick drive to the nearest SUL station if you plan things correctly. A bottle of two or Octane booster will do the trick if you run very low and need to put in £10 on NUL and a bottle of octane booster to get you to the next station. In reaity, with a bit of forward planning, it's not really a big issue. John
  18. Forgot to mention, that Chris' account was unlocked earlier this morning!
  19. Pete, of course we don't mind the occasional off-topic thread, this place would be too dull without it However, too many of these turn people off, as they find it difficult to find any threads that interest them (e.g. events, technical info, for sale stuff etc). The same goes for turning "sensible" threads into light hearted ones by taking them off topic with a "bit of banter". What one person finds "light hearted banter", others will find "annoying, pointless drivel", especially "in-jokes/comments" that only a few people in a small group are party to/understand. These sort of comments can stop people from going to events, as they are unsure/wary about the sort of people they'll be meeting. It can also stop people from posting on the forum, as they don't want adverse comments made when they post etc. There are quite a few moderators on this forum (all committee members for example) and we do try to keep a good natured, balanced structure to the forum. It is true that we don't do too much moderation, as it hasn't been required to date, and we would be very disappointed if we needed to do much in the future. Very rarely, people do push things a little bit too far for comfort, and we have to tidy up a bit. John
  20. I'd also say that paddle clutches aren't the best if you do a lot of town or stop/start driving. As Pete has also mentioned, the shock loading when doing fast starts can lead to premature failure of the gearbox (5 speed), but should be fine on the 6 speed. The AP organic and Helix both get good reviews from many satisified owners. Not the cheapest around, but they do the job well. John
  21. There's nothing wrong with replying to every thread, but we would prefer that people replying to threads actually add some value to them. Once we get the new server/software in place, we'll be able to have sub-sections where "off-topic" stuff can be discussed, without it cluttering up the main forum. John
  22. Great videos Cal Shows everyone just how much fund (and safe) Alford really is John
  23. That's the times emailled out to everyone who gave me their e-mail address. Some of the handwriting was a bit suspect, so apologies if I've misread any. You can contact me if you didn't receive them. Cheers John
  24. Ali, it wasn't the proper sprint format we were using. It's something like an extra half lap we were doing. In the correct sprint format, the start line is where we had it, but the finishing line is at the opposite side/end of the track, making it impossible to do anything close to accurate timings with a stopwatch. I'll be e-mailling out all the times either later tonight or tomorrow to everyone who took part. John
×
×
  • Create New...