I know this is going back a few posts but I've been away for the weekend:
<<
<< just out of curiosity...how many Cads members are members of the Sidc....it should be all of em in my opinion >>
To my mind Rob that statement implies that you want non SIDC members to be excluded from CADS.
This may not have been the sentiment behind the comment but to be honest thats how I read it also. It not allways easy to understand someones point of view in text . My wife thought my previous post was out of order, however that was not my intention, I was just trying to give an opinion.
The NBO wasn't well attended by CADS either although our last minute stand was up with the best its a pity we didn't know about the competition for best club stand and a couple of us left before the judging and partly dismantled the stand...........there is always next year by which time I'm hopeful we will be better prepared.
There may have been better CADS attandence at the NBO if it had been communicated better. I know there was a thread but there was little posting on it in the run up to the event. No mention of who was going or meeting points (I realise the people don't like to be routes on the forum but there allways PM's or email). I put a post on the day before asking if people were still going and from where, with little response other than Rasher's, unforunately I saw this too late. I appretiate that my post could have been missed as it was the day before the event. My point is that I should not have needed to ask. Obviously discussion took place as there was a CADS stand(which I didn't know about until I arrived) but there was no communication, more CADS, SIDC or not may have turned up if they had been told.
Treasure hunt thing sounds OK wouldn't mind giving that a go.
Did anything get discussed today?
Apologies for the font, could not get it right, adding text between quotes, all got a bit messy.
Andy