Burger9

Thanks for the replies I'll search instead

I've got a 98 UK 00' turbo, I've got (what seems to be standard fit but dont know) the Prodrive seats back n front. But engine wise ect how would I know/tell without getting on the rollers.

Just wondered, it's seemingly about 220 standard I think, because if it doesnt sell I'll maybe think about a wee tweak....nothing serious thought as I dont want to blow the h/g

Not just me then...

Was reading an ad on ebay for a 95 Impreza auto turbo wagon with 310hp and seemingly gets an average of 40mpg when under 2500revs....I couldnt get that on my standard manual one... **it is very good on fuel if driven economicaly i average 40mpg under 2500rpm.**

I dont know hellish much about subs, but from past experience Ive never heard of having to take an engine out to do a g/box, sound as if he's at it

Pm'd you

Yes, they were the same, I just cantget it any lower anywehere, like I say, my days of being a sub owner/driver are as good as finished. It'll sit in the garage till it's sold

I know what your saying, but the 550-600 for ins is a bloody killer, well it is for me. I know there good cars and I enjoy driving but 50odd quid a month just to pay Dick Turpin before I turn the bloody key to go anywhere's not on

Wonder what their "other stuff" is, great how they dont tell you, or did they, even so, their still robbing lying fkrs

You and balistic are probaby spot on what you say, but It's bloody crap that a car that's older than newer models get a more tarnished (for want of a better word) than the classics. You mention alarms, I was asked what I had on mine and if it had a tracker (Ive got both), a Clifford concept 50 which I believe at the time (maybe still by todays standards I dont know) was top notch. But even with that and the tracker has made fk all diffirence. Then again, maybe if I tried a quote without eiher I'd sh*t myself. What Ive found though when out in it, it's probably the exhaust note ie the boxer (standard though) it still some turns some heads, especially neds/chavs. And I guess that's a perfect fkn excuse the Dick Turpin & co to shaft us even harder

Oh i know, i just wanted to try a higher priced car, even my 2 relatives, 1 who has an 07 mx5 the other has an 09 saab 95 (2ltr but not sure model) and they both pay more/less what pay (well its cancelled). Obviously for some reason the impreza turbo is still classed as a high performance car even though there's other cars with more hp ect ect and lower ins. It's just crap!..... like i say, it really does look like my experience with sub (well a turbo anyway) is short lived

Just for the hell of it I put this in Compare the market for a quote..and it back cheaper than the Impreza turbo...ffs! http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201117385614376/sort/locasc/usedcars/fuel-type/diesel/model/impreza/make/subaru/radius/1500/page/1/postcode/pa26sf?logcode=p

Cheers Scot, thought I'd have had more replies though

It's bad Scot isnt it, it's as if they just take you money then fk you....then again, I s'pose that's what they did!... Like I say, if anyone's about to use them, read this first!